‘The Journey Into God Is Never Ending’

In Part 1 of his book Theology for a Troubled Believer, Diogenes Allen looks at the nature of God.  He begins with God’s self-revelation to Moses in a burning bush, and to Isaiah in the Temple.  In each encounter Allen emphasizes God’s holiness, which he defines not as moral purity but as transcendence — God’s total otherness from all created things.

God’s holiness, seen in this way, holds implications for us.  It means, for example, the traditional proofs of God’s existence, reasoning from effects to a First Cause, do not work.  This reasoning can only bring us to something within the universe, but God transcends the universe.  Allen believes the universe poses questions that point our attention toward the possibility of God, but the universe cannot provide us with evidence that inevitably proves the existence of God.  When atheists debunk traditional proofs for the existence of God, thinking they have pulled the rug out from under religion, they have not touched biblical religion at all; they have only discredited rational, naturalist forms of religion that date back to the Enlightenment.  Allen also observes wryly that the very notion of knowledge as proof no longer characterizes the sciences, which deal now only in probabilities.  Allen sees no conflict between science and biblical religion, since science by definition studies the natural world and the God of the Bible transcends nature.

God’s transcendence also explains the hiddenness of God.  Because God is not a part of nature, God is ordinarily hidden from our senses, which only perceive natural things.  We can learn to perceive God in other ways, but it takes practice and patience.  Far from being a negative thing, Allen views God’s hiddenness in positive terms:

The hiddenness of God should not cause us anxiety.  It is actually a mark of the unsurpassing greatness of God that God is hidden in God’s essential nature from us.  Indeed, it should give us immense assurance of God’s goodness toward us.  That a being of unsurpassable greatness, utterly full of life and lacking nothing, should desire to create other creatures, is an act of utter love, because there is nothing this being needs for itself.   And that God desires to have us as God’s beloved companions, to share in God’s eternal life and being, should fill us with wonder and unceasing thanksgiving.  In addition, God’s greatness explains why, when God makes Godself available to us, God must reduce God’s intensity, so to speak, so as not to overwhelm us utterly.  It also accounts for the craving of people who know God’s goodness to a degree to desire more and more to have God’s presence in their lives, and to persistently seek to enter into the life of God more deeply.  The journey into God is never ending, because of God’s utter fullness of being; it results in our entering more and more into a glorious never-ending joy.

A theme Allen touches on is what holiness means for us in terms of our conduct.  Here he says to be holy ourselves is to live a life of selfless love shown in the parable of the Good Samaritan.  Loving neighbors and pursuing justice in society are ways we emulate the holiness of God, who in the biblical history is seen to care for the widow, the orphan, the stranger and the outcast.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Theology and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to ‘The Journey Into God Is Never Ending’

  1. Ken says:

    Re: “they have not touched biblical religion at all; they have only discredited rational, naturalist forms of religion that date back to the Enlightenment.”

    They have touched biblical religion, and not just touched, but slapped down hard. Even biblical scholarship has undermined biblical religion. Wellhausen famously acknowledged that. To say that religion and science are not in conflict shows that he does not understand science. That God had nothing to do with evolution, for example, was precisely Darwin’s point. There has been much discussion of this in literature since Darwin’s time. It seems that Allen missed it.

    re: “Allen emphasizes God’s holiness, which he defines not as moral purity but as transcendence — God’s total otherness from all created things.”

    That is inconsistent with saying, “Loving neighbors and pursuing justice in society are ways we emulate the holiness of God,”

    In the latter quote, Allen is aligned with enlightenment thinkers who held: morality is the essence of religion. He is, in this sense, like Gulley.

    I think maintaining religion in the way Allen does requires a kind of intellectual retrenchment or obstinance. It is as if he is saying, “I don’t care about what has happened since the enlightenment, I still believe.”

  2. Chris says:

    Well then…

    Allen makes his arguments well. Perhaps you could read them first hand. His ideas must lose something being filtered through me.

    I think Allen understands and respects science. He also notes its limits.

    Allen does not believe morality is the essence of religion, although that section on loving neighbors could have been developed more fully.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s