The Line That Separates You From Homelessness

This is the stairwell at the homeless shelter at 4:30 this morning.  Outside it was still dark on West Church St.  I finished my overnight shift with SC, a nurse in our congregation.  We passed the time in the volunteer room, taking turns staying awake.  She carried more of the night than I did.  When awake I read from my Kindle and worked on crossword puzzles.  The night was uneventful — no one pounding on the door at 2 a.m.  14 men and 4 women slept here, plus the two of us.  Everyone had to leave by 8 a.m.  They head around to the other side of the building for breakfast, then probably a shower at the YMCA.  They can go over to the Damascus Road Ministry and use their warming room during the day.  I will open the shelter again this evening at 6:45 p.m.  The homeless, it seems to me, suffer from misfortune, poor choices, or substance abuse, or a combination of these.  During the night I wondered what it would take to become homeless myself.  I doubt that many people expect to be homeless in their life.  It simply comes upon you.  The line that separates you from homelessness did not seem all that wide at 4:30 this morning.  About as wide as one of those steps.

My Opinion of Obama

My wife and I watched President Obama’s State of the Union address this evening.  We chose PBS because we felt it would have the least amount of inane commentary on the speech.  We wanted to be free to engage in our own inane commentary.  Such as, do the president and vice-president confer on who will wear the red tie and who will wear the blue?  You know they have to talk about these things.  It was a good speech, I thought.  The ending with the SEAL team flag was powerful imagery.

I supported Obama in ’08.  His voice was reassuring during the debates with McCain.  With the economy in free fall, that was a scary time.  On his record, I approve his attempt to move the US toward universal health care.  Access to quality medical care is so important.  I was discouraged, though, when he rejected the oil pipeline from Canada to Texas.  That is a lost (or delayed) chance to put thousands of men and women to work building it, helping families have breadwinners again.  My feelings on other things he has done are similarly mixed, but my opinion of him is generally positive.

After reading Dreams From My Father, I understand better what motivates President Obama.  With a few reservations, I am still inclined to support him again in the fall.  He will be the most experienced candidate running, and he will remain a counterweight to conservatives in Congress.  As a political agnostic, I am fine with divided government.

An Officeless Voice

The Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin on Sarah Palin:

Politico reports on the latest from Sarah Palin: “ ‘Not only do I love my freedom of not having a title and being a declared candidate — that is liberating — I know you can make a difference as an individual,’ she said. ‘Hopefully, I can inspire others to know that you don’t need a title. You don’t need to be in office to effect positive change.’ ’’

In the many things Palin has said, some to provoke and some revealing of her limitations as a national politician, these are perhaps the most honest words she has ever uttered.

In our society, an office signifies many things, among them power.  The principal’s office, the doctor’s office, the manager’s office, the governor’s office — all places of power.  Which must be why people spend such energy to gain an office, and argue so over who should or should not occupy an office.  As a pastor, I have an office: both a physical space to work and an official role and function in the church.  Like any office, mine is also a place of power to be used with great care; and I recognize that often the creative new ideas in church come not from the pastor’s office but from a parishioner touched by the Spirit of God.  In the Bible, Daniel and David had offices, but Abraham, Ruth and Jesus did not.  God works with or without official channels of power, but God appears to prefer the poor, the dispossessed and the officeless voice.

Sarah Palin draws devotion or derision.  I avoid both responses to her.  But her quest to change the world apart from a formal office is a good one.  (She has also, inadvertently, nudged me to put this book on my summer reading list.)

(image from SarahPAC)

The Scale Has Tipped

The Presbyterian Church USA has removed language from its constitution that prevented gay ordination.  Gays and lesbians may now be ordained as ministers, elders and deacons.

Amendment 10-A removes the “fidelity and chastity” language from the PC(USA) constitution. Presbyteries and sessions still would examine candidates for ordination or installation, with the standard being that a candidate’s “manner of life should be a demonstration of the Christian gospel in the church and in the world.”

The amendment also instructs governing bodies to “be guided by Scripture and the confessions in applying standards to individual candidates.”

That likely would mean that some congregations and presbyteries would ordain gay and lesbians who are involved in relationships – and some more conservative governing bodies would not. Also, a particular governing body might decide to ordain some gays and lesbians but not others, based on individual assessments of the strengths and weaknesses of particular candidates.

I voted 14 years ago in favor of the fidelity and chastity language.  But my mind has changed in that time — my scale has tipped in a new direction.  I was pleased to see the language removed.  The new amendment passed our presbytery by a vote of 67 to 39 in February.

April Envelopes

We collect tax documents in a brown manila envelope on the back of the closet door.  The second week of April I gather our materials together and run the numbers through the computer.  (Praise God for tax preparation software.)  Then I take two thick envelopes to the post office, one bound for the Michigan treasury and the other to the IRS.  This year we owe Michigan a small amount, and we expect a small refund from the US government.  Each year the computer offers me the option of an e-file, but I opt for paper and snail mail; some things I still choose to do the old-fashioned way.  Perhaps I do not want to alter what works. The bulk of what we owe goes to Social Security taxes, since the IRS considers ministers self-employed; in the pay-as-you-go Social Security system, our taxes fund the lives of current retirees.

Jesus (Mt 22:21) and Paul (Rom 13:7) counsel us to pay our taxes.  I do this willingly, but not with great eagerness — which is why, although the taxes themselves are already paid, the thick envelopes don’t go out till the deadline in April.

Not Following the News

I don’t spend much time with the radio, television, and the daily paper.  A car without a radio is a place for contemplation.  When friends object that I don’t know what is going on and am not concerned with the life of our society, I answer that they are deluded.  History does not happen by the day.  Once I read every copy of a leading newspaper from January to September 1870, with the intention of discovering the nature of the historical forces of that period.  What I did discover was a host of superficialities, fleeting illusions, and enormous blind spots as to what was really going on.

George Peck

We enjoy our local paper, The Daily Telegram, but I think his point holds well for national and international news.

Stott’s Secret of Success

David Neff notes books to be published in recognition of John Stott’s 90th birthday next month.  He also suggests a two-fold reason for Stott’s success:

Stott’s discernment and discipline. John Stott’s enormous influence on evangelicalism, in England, America, and around the globe, was possible because he prayerfully discerned what God wanted him to do (and not to do), and then he focused on those things (and disciplined himself not to do many other good things).

To be successful you must neglect many good things in favor of the best things.

‘An Instrument of His Will’

The President speaks of his faith at the National Prayer Breakfast:

On Thursday, Obama spoke of the value of prayer, saying, “Let me tell you, these past two years, they have deepened my faith.” He talked of the daily meditations he receives from Joshua DuBois, head of his faith-based initiatives office, the occasional visits from pastors to pray with him in the Oval Office, and the “respite and fellowship” of the chapel at Camp David.

“When I wake in the morning, I wait on the Lord, and I ask him to give me the strength to do right by our country and its people,” he said. “And when I go to bed at night, I wait on the Lord, and I ask him to forgive me my sins and look after my family and the American people and make me an instrument of his will.”

Woman In the Fountain

Ann Althouse reflects on the woman at a mall who fell into a fountain while texting and later found herself famous on YouTube:

We need to learn how to live in the world as it is. When we’re in public, we have a new dimension of visibility because of digital cameras and the internet. I’ve been thinking about the effect this is having on politics. Politicians have to watch every single thing they say. That’s difficult.

You have to be careful what graphics you put on your maps now too.  Anything can become a liability.

I was at Morning Fresh today, reading my Kindle, and the Woman In the Fountain was on CNN, complaining about what happened to her.  Strangely, I felt little sympathy.  I was struck by the inability to laugh at yourself.  What if she had said, “I am glad that so many people are finding joy and amusement at my ineptness.  We all need more laughter in life.  I’ll be more careful next time.”

CNN showed that little video snip a dozen times.  I was reminded, too, of the Woman At the Well, who fortunately did not fall in.

Talking About Tuscon

I haven’t said anything about the terrible thing in Tuscon because (a) there hasn’t been a lack of commentary and (b) I seldom offer such commentary here.  But I will make an exception and share a few thoughts that have lingered in me.

Mental Illness.  The equation in Tuscon:  mental illness + weapon = disaster.  I worked as a chaplain at a state psychiatric hospital during seminary.  I spent many hours sitting in a lounge talking with the mentally ill while a giant TV blared in the corner.  I asked one of the doctors once what causes mental illness.  His response was “chemical imbalances in the brain,” which I took to mean, “we don’t have a clue.”  I hope more clues will come out as the brain and mental illnesses are studied.

Heated Rhetoric.  I followed the discussion this week as pundits tried to link heated public discourse with the shooting in Arizona.  The more evidence that comes to light, though, the more clear there is no connection in this case.  I am skeptical, too, of saying that words with violent imagery create a ‘climate’ that makes physical violence more likely.  How would you prove such a link?  Notions of such a ‘climate’ are rhetorical tools to link things that otherwise have no connection.  For what it’s worth, even Jesus used violent imagery when he warned of someone having a large millstone tied around their neck and being thrown into the sea — a good example of ‘eliminationist rhetoric.’  He was also known to call his opponents ‘snakes.’  I am a civil person, and I value civility in relationships.  That being said, I don’t always expect political leaders to show civility toward one another.  I do not mind when they breathe fire at one another.  It shows their passion and honesty.

Reassuring Voice.  President Obama, I thought, handled himself well at the memorial service.  He is a fine public speaker, and his rich baritone voice is pleasing to listen to.  It was important to learn about the lives lost.  I didn’t need him to discern a Great Moral Meaning to this.  I simply wanted him to calm and reassure me with his voice.  He did.

How Many Facebook Friends?

Oxford evolutionary anthropologist Robin Dunbar says up to 150.

Put simply, our minds are not designed to allow us to have more than a very limited number of people in our social world. The emotional and psychological investments that a close relationship requires are considerable, and the emotional capital we have available is limited.

Indeed, no matter what Facebook allows us to do, I have found that most of us can maintain only around 150 meaningful relationships, online and off — what has become known as Dunbar’s number. Yes, you can “friend” 500, 1,000, even 5,000 people with your Facebook page, but all save the core 150 are mere voyeurs looking into your daily life.

Dunbar also notes we will devote 40 percent of our ‘emotional capital’ each week to our five most important relationships.

Christmas and Human Dignity

Carson Holloway on the connection between Christmas and human dignity:

I would suggest that the ethical core of Western Civilization—or at least a key principle by which it distinguished itself from what it regarded as savagery and barbarism—is respect for the dignity of humanity and of the individual human person. This is the moral principle underpinning the more obvious institutional characteristics such as the rule of law, constitutionalism, limited government, and division of social authority among various centers of power. All of these expedients share a common aim: limiting the power of some people over others, and especially limiting the power of the strong over the weak. This aim in turn is informed by the sense that all people deserve such protection, that they all possess a certain dignity that ought not be abused.

The celebration of Christmas has been a powerful teacher of the dignity of the human person. For Christians, Christmas is the feast of the Incarnation—the celebration of the moment when God became a man in order to live among men. It shows that God thought of human beings as worthy of being saved, and that he sought to save them by taking on humanity in a perfected form, thus opening the way to their own perfection. Christian belief in the Incarnation is thus inseparable from belief in the objective, and even transcendent, value of the human race as a whole, and of each human person as an individual.

Amen.  And Merry Christmas to all.

Google and Michigan Football

Someone has filled in the names for the 50 states using suggestions from Google.  Schools and sports teams predominate.  My state of Michigan comes up as Michigan Football — which is a sad topic these days.  I think God is angry at the UofM football program because they poached West Virginia’s coach a few years ago.  Thou shalt not steal.

My alma mater, though, the University of Nevada, did well in football this year, especially this game.

(Image from Mashable)

‘They Are Being Watched Over’

Three young boys from Morenci have been missing since Thanksgiving and are feared dead.  Or in the language of the local police chief, “The information we have does not indicate that it’s going to be a positive outcome.”  The boys’ names are Andrew, Alexander and Tanner.  Searchers have been looking for them in areas of Ohio and Michigan.  Their father, apparently mentally ill, is in custody.

Their pastor is responding with hospitality and faith:

The Rev. Donna Galloway of Morenci United Methodist Church, the church the Skelton family attends, invited community members to come to the church if they are seeking a quiet place away from the commotion and the media spotlight.

Galloway, who is also the Morenci Fire Department’s chaplain, asked people to pray for the boys, their family, and the law enforcement officials and volunteers who are searching for them.

Galloway said the missing boys are “very special.”

“Sunday, standing and looking out and not seeing them sitting in their little shirts and ties was real difficult,” she said. “But we are a community of faith and we have belief in God and we know that they are being watched over.”

Analyzing a Picture of the Pope

This news story about the Pope’s visit to Spain included this picture of the Pope from photographer Daniel Ochoa de Olza.  What does the picture say about the Pope?

  • The photo is cropped with the Pope standing on the right.  Yes, of course.  Where else would a conservative Pope be but on the right?
  • He needs to stand on a little platform.  Apparently, he is not tall.
  • The colors behind him are jarring.  Gold, brownish-red.  It looks like he is standing out in front of an abstract, modernist painting.  In his speech the Pope decried ‘aggressive secularism.’  The setting behind him looks aggressively modern and secular, unlike the Sistine Chapel, where the Pope doubtless feels more secure and at ease.
  • His eyes are down reading his text.  No eye contact.  A man more comfortable with words and ideas than with people?

What Farms Can Teach Politicians

Danny Heitman, a Louisiana journalist, says now that the election is over the best thing for politicians to do is nothing, so they can rest for a while.

If our political culture has come to embrace the ethic of the factory – a seven-day operation, without pause for reflection – then we shouldn’t be surprised that the language of our political discourse so often sounds vaguely robotic, as if it’s being nudged through an assembly line for public consumption…

Perhaps the better model for enlightened leadership isn’t the factory but the farm, an enterprise grounded in the assumption that there is value in being fallow, that good things can come from brief periods of inactivity.

I like his pun on the word grounded, since farms grow crops out of the ground.  He would like political leaders to become more grounded by cultivating time for rest and reflection after a frenetic election season.  He quotes Wayne Mueller’s book on Sabbath, which we used in a Lenten study a few years ago.

The analogy to farming breaks down somewhere since farmers are still active even when their land is inactive.  But there is still wisdom in the point itself:  in small doses, rest and inactivity make for a healthy life.

A Reason For Not Voting

Michael Degan, a Mennonite journalist, offers his reason for not voting:

What does God really want from us in the end? Has God taken sides in the prominent political issues of our time? Is God rooting for us to make abortion illegal, to end the war, to wipe out poverty, to prevent gays from marrying? Does God need our political machinery to establish the heavenly kingdom on earth?

I have discerned that God does not operate that way. I believe that God is watching us most closely when we stand face-to-face with those who disagree, oppose, or resent us. How do we react? With love or with hate? In God’s way or in the world’s way?

I reject voting not because there is anything intrinsically wrong with it, but because of who I become in order to win. When I join in that contest, I can’t help but succumb to the hatred.

Christians are called to proclaim the kingdom of God, not necessarily to create it. Creating is God’s divine work. When we try to create the kingdom, we undertake a self-serving and vain exercise in which we choose friendship with the world, and by so doing choose “enmity with God” (Jas 4:4)

This is the end of his essay in Electing Not to Vote:  Christian Reflections On Reasons For Not Voting.  He does not vote on principle because the negative emotions found in politics are too tempting.  Voting for him fits too easily with a love of mammon, which Jesus said we cannot love and still love God.

What is your reason for voting?  Or not voting?

ADDED:  I presented this quote to a clergy gathering yesterday and asked them what their reasons were for voting (or not voting).  The best answer was “I vote because I feel guilty if I don’t vote.”  Later, driving to Toledo and Ypsilanti for hospital calls, I reflected on why I choose to vote.  The basic reason is gratitude.  I am blessed to live in a country with a good system of government.  Being a citizen of Christ’s heavenly kingdom is far more important, because it offers blessings for this life and into eternity, but being a citizen of a certain earthly kingdom is not a light matter.  In its own sphere, it is important.  The only participation my government asks of me is casting a ballot every other year or so.  This is not hard to do, and it affirms the importance of human governments themselves.  I respect those like Michael Degan who abstain from voting out of conscience, but my own conscience tells me to vote.

A President’s Philosophy

Harvard historian James Kloppenberg has been studying President Obama’s philosophy:

To Mr. Kloppenberg the philosophy that has guided President Obama most consistently is pragmatism, a uniquely American system of thought developed at the end of the 19th century by William James, John Dewey and Charles Sanders Peirce…

Pragmatism maintains that people are constantly devising and updating ideas to navigate the world in which they live; it embraces open-minded experimentation and continuing debate. “It is a philosophy for skeptics, not true believers,” Mr. Kloppenberg said.

Which may explain why true believers are unhappy now.

Read the article here.

ADDED:  Ann Althouse rebuts.

Ideology and the News

A snippet of National Public Radio’s defense in the Juan Williams matter caught my attention last week:

Writes NPR ombudsman Shephard: “This latest incident with Williams centers around a collision of values: NPR’s values emphasizing fact-based, objective journalism versus the tendency in some parts of the news media, notably Fox News, to promote only one side of the ideological spectrum.”

I am curious about how words are used.  The word ideological is used today to cast doubt on someone.  An ideology sounds suspect, not fact-based and objective.

Here is the definition of ideology in Merriam-Webster’s dictionary:

  1. a systematic body of concepts especially about human life and culture.
  2. a manner or the content of thinking characteristic of an individual, group, or culture.
  3. the integrated assertions, theories and aims that constitute a sociopolitical program.

Nos. 1 and 2 are normal and inevitable.  Everyone uses concepts to interpret life.  They may not be systematic about it, but that’s how our minds work.  And groups will have a manner of thinking peculiar to them.  In this sense, everyone and every group has an ideology.  But definition no. 3 is the issue, the belief that a ‘sociopolitical program’ undermines fact-based objectivity, particularly in news organizations.

Two years ago there was a comedy sketch on Saturday Night Live where Queen Latifah (as PBS journalist Gwen Ifill) moderated a mock Vice-Presidential debate and took a break to promote her new book about Barack Obama, The Breakthrough.  We all laughed at the humor, but under the laughter was the knowledge that journalists themselves have a stake in the outcome of elections.

The question is whether the stake influences the journalism.  I suspect the answer is as complicated as all of human life and motivation.  But I wonder in this respect if you can distinguish between active and passive ideologies, between journalists who consciously promote a political philosophy and other journalists who do so unconsciously, in how they select facts, neglect other facts and shape it all for public consumption.  Of the two, in the long term the passive ideology may be more powerful because it is less apparent.

Perhaps I am merely a child of postmodernity, but in any presentation of the news of the day — from any source — I expect ideology in all its senses is bubbling beneath the surface of things, like juices in the stew.

Devout and Diverse

From National Public Radio on The Role of Religion in the Voting Booth:

[I]n some respects, America is quite unusual. It’s partly because of the separation of church and state that goes back to the Constitution. But Americans are, compared to other peoples in the world… way very, very religious. We are – the average American, in terms of attendance at church or saying that important – religion is important to them, and so on, the average American is as religious – a little [more] religious than the average Iranian. So Americans are very religious.

We are also very diverse in our religions. Not only between Catholics and Protestants, which was historically the big difference, but now increasingly other religions, too. In most parts of the world, places that are deeply devout and diverse religiously have a high index of mayhem - that is, there’s a – taken in high doses, religion is generally toxic to civic health.

But America, despite what we’ve been saying about the polarization – and that’s, of course, true over the last generation – Americans actually, including religion – religious people of all sorts, are surprisingly tolerant of other people. And so – and certainly way more tolerant than you’d expect given the fact that we’re very religious and diverse in our religiosity.

This excerpt occurs at about 22:30 in the audio.  It’s a 30 minute discussion.  I found two things interesting:  1) the tension between individual conscience and the social teachings of religious organizations; and 2) the people whose religious beliefs lead them toward being a hybrid in their social views and voting habits.